Day: 12 April 2011

  • On Page Optimisation

    On Page Optimisation

    On Page Optimisation is where all the information gathered in earlier parts of the process guide us as to how we should construct the actual pages. Each page should, ideally, act as a “landing page” so try and forget the notion that the “home page” is the one to be optimised.

    It will be optimised but other pages should get the same treatment – but for different keywords. On one site I am familiar with the home page is the ‘most popular’ landing page in absolute terms. But of all the page visits only 3% land directly in the home page.

    Content

    Some optimisation techniques will be dependent on what type of site you have. Having said that, all optimisation should include the following.

    Title Tag: For keywords and geographic and other relevant information such as company name. On that, many companies optimise (unwittingly) for their company name in the title. All well and good if it’s a recognised brand and that name will be searched.  If it’s not, place more emphasis on the products/services that a person will be searching for.

    Meta Tags: In terms of meta tags, after your title tag, the meta description tag is the next most important. It’s the small paragraph that appears in search results and it is most likely the part of the selection process that searchers decide to click or not. Depending on how long it takes to have your pages re-indexed, it could contain information that may change over the year – “Sale On Now”, “Free delivery in December” – something that in the search results will set you apart from the other ten websites vying for that click.

    Optimised HTML Tags: There are several HTML tags that should be optimised:

    • H (1-6) Tags – again keywords in there, but not stuffed.

    • Internal Links: For both links to pages, images or documents you should use keywords in the link text. Internal links are considered to be particularly important, but normally passed over in the rush to start exploring external links.

    • Bold and Italics are useful
    • Blockquotes show an emphasis

    Image Tags: all of your images should be optimised. Images have their own search category and therefore should be given some extra attention.

    • have an ‘alt’ and a title in every image. The Alt is the descriptor that shows up if the image is missing. The title is the tool tip that shows up when you hover over the image.

    • Rename the file if it’s not user friendly. It may be machine friendly, but it also should convey what the image actually is
    • again, link back to your images in a descriptive way.

    If you want to see why using keywords in internal linking for images is important, do a Google image search for ‘click here’. You’ll see a good few ‘click here’ buttons, which is fine. But you’ll also see a huge number of images that have been indexed under ‘click here’ and not under something that they actually are Click Here! It’s such a waste of SEO property.   

  • Site Audit

    Site Audit

    In looking at a site with the site analysis or site audit hat on there are a number of areas that you would want to concentrate on. Below are listed some of the areas that should be analyised.

    SearchCrawling and indexing: How many pages have been indexed and how many pages are there on the site. Is there a gap (there can be small gaps at times)?  Is there a big difference between the indexed and actual pages and why? Using an online crawler (or offline) like seo-browser will show you how your page appears to a search engine – which will be very different to how it’s rendered in a browser. See blog article of a real life example of this difference.
    SearchSearch engine Ranking: What is the current status of your site in the various search engines? Where does it rank (if at all). It’s a fairly straightforward exercise and just has to be run off against some of the chosen keywords for benchmarking purposes.
    SearchURL Structure: The URL’s on your site are important not only for the spider visitors, but also for humans. A URL that can be “read” is infinitely better than one that’s generated by a content management system without any instructions to alter that URL. Keywords in your URL may give you a bit of a boost in the search results.
    SearchSite Structure: Similar to your URL structure you should try and make your site navigation as simple as possible. By site navigation we mean how easy is it to get from, say, the home page to your checkout page. During that excursion, is it easy to tell where exactly you are and is it easy to navigate forward and backward.  This planning really should be done when the site is being designed as it’s easier to execute at that point than after. It’s still very possible to restructure a site after it’s been in the wild but it means using redirects etc which can be problematic.
    SearchCode: Although small code problems are not exactly a deal breaker but if a search engine comes across bad or poorly formed code it may abandon the page altogether. Its best to run your code through a code validator just to make sure that it’s all above board.
    SearchPage Speed: This is a big issue currently and according to Google’s representative on earth, Matt Cutts, page speed will be one of 200+ factors used in calculating page rank. The best approach to this is to either check your speed online. I like Pingdom Tools as it keeps a record of a sites performance so you can see how your efforts are being rewarded. There is plenty/a fair amount you can do to improve your pages speed. Look at the code and especially your images as they are the low hanging fruit. You can ensure that large files loaded at the early part of the page load are actually needed at that point (like css or js files) and that if they are needed should some of them be compressed (like a GZIP compression of some of the css files if your server allows it)
    Search Page Title and Descriptions: Page titles and descriptions in a lot of search results inform human visitors what the page they could potentially click on is actually about – and are worth a big effort. There is more information on this particular topic here
    SearchKeyword Analysis We’ve looked at it here is some detail. Essentially it’s a root and branch analysis of the site looking at it from a keyword point of view 
    SearchSitemaps: There should be two types of sitemap a sitemap for the human element and another for the spiders. The latter is a xml file which you can build on line for free. Put the xml file in the root directory of the site and then make sure that in Google Webmaster Tools you submit that file to Google. Just be careful that the URL’s you use in that file are exactly the same as you use on site otherwise there may be an issue with duplicate content.
    Search404’s: You can use many applications like xenulink to make sure that all the links on your site lead somewhere.  You will also get a steer in GWT if some of your URL’s lead to a dead end. A lot of CRM systems have inbuilt 404 pages where, if a page does not exist, it throws up a simple 404 notification. This normally stops all spiders in their tracks as there is no way forward. It’s best to make a 404 page yourself, one that gives the uses some options if they reach a dead link. Many custom 404 pages have site search options etc, its something not only for the spiders to keep plugging away, but for the end users as well.
    SearchRobots.txt: This is a small file that points and guides spiders as to what they can index and what they should keep away from.
  • Keyword Research

    Keyword Research

    keywordKeyword Research is the next stage of the process. Having compiled a list of industry terms in our first pass and then seen, through the competitor analysis, which terms your closest competitors are aiming for, we are now beginning to build up a lexicon of words specific to a particular industry.

    But while you will find certain keyword expressions being mentioned again and again, there is a trade off between the time, cost and effort it would take to rank on that specific phrase and the volume of business it would bring your way.

    Obviously in certain markets there are trophy terms accepted by the industry as a whole to be key drivers. But the first thing to get to grips with is what words and phrases do potential customers use to look for a product or service. For an individual beginning to search for a product is always a learning process.

    Initially searchers will begin using broad product search -“Mobile Phone” for example. But as they define their product preferences and begin to eliminate or adopt certain products, their search terms become way more focused. Further they begin to learn terms and rapidly narrow their search from product category, then to brands and then to specific products.

    Search_progress

    Looking at some real life examples: We work on a site that lists events and venues, a kind of “ents” site. A very busy week for the site would be the run up to and including St. Patrick’s Day. Limiting our analysis to the feast of the patron Saint, in the week of the 17th, the site was visited by people using 1006 different key phrases containing the word “Patrick”. (It should be noted that there were 57 keyword phrases containing the word ‘Paddy’ – so there’s no accounting for taste!).

    If you think that visitors are going to spell your company name or the product correctly, think again. Out of the 1006 keywords used only 37 managed to used “St. Patrick’s” in the correct form with a period at the “St” and no sloppy apostrophes attached to the name – and certainly no abbreviations of the same.

    Taking on board that people will search in different ways, you still have to have a list of primary phrases that you feel will act as strong drives. But these front line phrases will only deliver a certain amount of traffic and here we introduce the concept of the ‘long tail’.

    long_tail

    Take again that week in March, the top 100 keyword phrases brought in just shy of 10% of the total visitors. The top 500 dragged in nearly 20% of the total traffic. As there were many thousands of keyword phrases used during the week, over 70% of the visits were spread across tens of thousand plus key phrases. The points to illustrate here:

    • there are a few phrases that have good search volumes in any industry but they can be very difficult to rank for due to the sheer volume of competition
    • whatever way you look at it, the majority of your traffic will come from other quarters – from the long tail.
    • in order to capitalise on this you have to have a site with relevant content and enough content to cover many of the long tailed searches.

    Keyword research is incredibly important and you have to spend a bit of time on it. Opting for a keyword(s) that are not a good fit for a page or that are low volume can be a disaster for a site.

  • Irish Newspaper Circulation April 2010

    A marginal decrease in the mornings this month. Taking into account the ‘disruption’ in the buying cycle for Easter and School holidays – its not a bad result. 

    However the year on year picture is very bleak. The tabloids account for 24,000 of the 29,000 drop in the market year on year. Just how much more blood letting can that tabloids take is anyone’s guess.   

    The Sunday market is beginning to get a little interesting. In last months figures, it looked as if the much publicised defection of Paul Williams to the News of the World didn’t materialise into sales with the paper only adding 998 copies in Pauls first month at his new desk.  

    But the continuing heavy advertising campaign and, it has the be said, the input that Paul has made into the paper story wise, would seem to have paid off with the paper gaining  9,400 month on month – pretty respectable in these ‘straitened times’.

    The only obvious looser in the figures below would seem to be the Sunday Daily Star who dropped 1,800 month on month. However the picture is incomplete. As the ‘established’ Irish Papers don’t produce monthly circulation figures, we don’t know how the Sunday World has faired in the past two months.

    One would suggest that the Sunday Market has not expanded of late and therefore the copies that were picked up by the News of the World have to be coming from another paper. But in this fast paced environment we will have to wait until August (when the Sunday Worlds figures are published) to get an answer to that question.

    There was really no point in commenting on the Racing Post figure last month. Their March figure would, historically be their strongest on the back of the Cheltenham Festival. In February they brought out an Irish Edition and expanded their coverage to include specifically Irish sports such as GAA  and the League of Ireland. On the back of the April figures, it looks as if the gamble paid off.    

    Overall the whole market is up 9,000 month on month but back 7.7% year on year. The publications that innovated and took some brave steps made the gains in this months figures.

    Title    Mar-10    Apr-10    Apr-09    M on M    Y on Y
    Daily Mirror 60,072 60,155 65,126 83 -5,054
    Daily Record 756 780 2,625 24 -1,869
    Irish Daily Star 94,200 93,350 102,002 -850 -7,802
    The Sun 86,598 86,179 96,198 -419 -9,600
               
    Daily Express 2,926 2,895 3,329 -31 -403
    Irish Daily Mail 49,271 49,537 50,746 266 -1,475
               
    The Daily Telegraph 2,670 2,878 3,175 208 -505
    Financial Times 3,565 3,588 4,169 23 -604
    The Guardian 3,727 3,757 4,666 30 -939
    The Independent 1,081 1,139 1,848 58 -767
    The Times 2,549 2,621 3,006 72 -457
    Morning Market 307,415 306,879 336,890 -536 -29,475
               
    Daily Star – Sunday 52,493 50,611 64,057 -1,882 -11,564
    News of the World 130,919 140,329 134,309 9,410 -3,390
    Sunday Mail 1,856 1,561 6,831 -295 -4,975
    Sunday Mirror 36,448 35,503 40,811 -945 -4,363
    The People 20,142 20,576 25,826 434 -5,684
               
    Sunday Express 3,904 4,070 4,844 166 -940
    Sunday Post 814 785 903 -29 -89
    The Mail on Sunday 111,500 114,727 111,936 3,227 -436
               
    Independent on Sunday 1,551 1,858 2,405 307 -854
    The Observer 8,193 8,006 9,569 -187 -1,376
    The Sunday Telegraph 2,422 2,471 2,560 49 -138
    The Sunday Times 111,771 111,128 118,375 -643 -6,604
    Sunday  Market 482,013 491,625 522,426 9,612 -40,413
               
    Racing Post 8,754 7,534 8,379 -1,220 375
    Total Market 789,428 798,504 859,316 9,076 -69,888